Xfce.org | Xfce Goodies | Xfce Foundation Classes | Xfce Bug Tracker | Xfce Wiki | Xfce Forum | Xfce-look | Xfce DevBlog     

Xfce News
The little mouse told me...

24 Oct 2005

Monty Hall

Erik @ 16:53:55 UTC — Filed under: Other topics

Perhaps a real mathematician can help me here. I just don’t understand the supposed solution to the Monty Hall problem.

I understand the reasons that it is supposed “unintuitive” but I still believe them. Allow me to forumlate the objection in a way that seems novel.

Once Monty reveals the Donkey, and you are given what is in reality a new problem – pick a door with a 50% probablity of any one being the right one. The thing is that switching from your originally selected door doesn’t change the probability of the door being the right one. Merely the act of revealing the donkey behind one of the unselected doors does.

So what’s critical is selecting a door under these new odds – which is exactly what Monty is letting you door. The key for me is that even choosing to keep the door you already have is a selection.

What am I missing?

author_img

6 Comments »

  1. > Once Monty reveals the Donkey, and you are given what is in reality a new problem

    You’re not given a new problem. You have been given extra information on the problem you had. In other words, if you forget or ignore what has happened up to Monty opening the door, you are losing information. That information is what increases the odds from 50% to 66% if you choose not to ignore it.

    Another way to look at it: When you choose one door, the odds of the prize being in one of the other two doors is 2/3. In fact, Monty is giving you the chance to choose the other two doors at the same time, so to speak.

    Hope this helps.

    Comment by MikeB — 24 Oct 2005 @ 22:53:26 UTC

  2. My first thought was the same as yours, but when I googled for an explanation I stumbled across this site that I think explains it pretty well: http://www.comedia.com/hot/monty-answer.html
    Interesting problem, though :)

    Comment by jos — 24 Oct 2005 @ 23:02:02 UTC

  3. You are simply missing, that the person who opens a door for you does this based on his knowledge of the right solution.

    Comment by Niklas — 25 Oct 2005 @ 07:53:52 UTC

  4. It’s simple. The point ist that the act of revealing doesn’t provide an additional information
    about your first choice. Hence, the probabilty, that you already have made the right choice, stays the same.

    Comment by anyone — 25 Oct 2005 @ 11:49:31 UTC

  5. Hey Erik, does this make any sense to you: http://blog.xfce.org/?p=146 . I believe that is the problem you are talking about.

    Hmm, I also see now that the donkey is indeed not the prize…

    Comment by Jasper — 25 Oct 2005 @ 11:58:28 UTC

  6. These comments have been invaluable to me as is this whole site. I thank you for your comment.

    Comment by Annerose — 22 Jun 2007 @ 09:51:32 UTC

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Webmaster
Xfce is © Olivier FOURDAN 1996 - 2004 | Powered by WordPress and Lunar Linux | 5.231