No, not the memory footprint of Xfce. My ecological footprint according to this site.
CATEGORY / GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD / 1.5
MOBILITY / 1.7
SHELTER / 1.7
GOODS/SERVICES / 2.7
TOTAL FOOTPRINT / 7.6
Not too bad, you would say, considering Brian got 24, but…
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 4.8 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
I don’t know where they got this figure, but I have a very hard time believing that. I have a small car, a small house, produce little waste and usually don’t fly. That should be below average, except maybe for the 130km a day I have to drive, so let’s say average, not 1.5 times higer.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.2 PLANETS.
Oops ;-)
spurious interrupt .:. weblog wrote:
[...] According to my score (the lower of the two), if everyone lived like me, we would need 3.9 planets. Jasper lives in The Netherlands, and while their average much lower than in the US, he even overshoots it by quite a bit. [...]
Link | April 27th, 2006 at 18:40
Hmm… the site didn’t work for me today:
“Active Server Pages error ‘ASP 0126′”
Was this just an Earth day site, or is it supposed to work even now (as well as something should on Active Server)?
Link | May 1st, 2006 at 16:43
OK, got it… 10. Beat ya, Brian. :P
Link | May 2nd, 2006 at 15:44
Hehe, I only need 2.3 planets ;)
Link | May 21st, 2006 at 02:15
The test is a bit skewed, try to fill the answer as if you were a baby or a teenager, most of their footprint is shared, that’s why the number are higher for the typical answer.
Link | August 19th, 2006 at 17:23