Xfce

Subdomains
 

GSoC 22 – The First Blog Post

  • May 28, 2022
  • Pratyaksh Gautam

I’m really looking forward to this summer, since my project proposal for this
year’s Google Summer of Code has been selected! I’ll be working on adding
features to Thunar file
manager
,
an XFCE application, with the help of my mentor Alexander Schwinn.

My history with XFCE

I’ve been big on open-source ever since my school days, and actually ran
Xubuntu (an Ubuntu distribution with XFCE as its desktop
environment) on my daily driver, an old netbook back in eleventh grade. It was
too slow of a device to run GNOME, so I absolutely had to use a lighter-weight
desktop environment, and compared to alternatives like
LXDE which I didn’t like the aesthetics of, and
pantheon (the default DE for elementaryOS) which still
felt lacking in terms of performance, XFCE was the perfect balance of form and
functionality.

Since then, I’ve done some distro-hopping before settling on my current setup,
hand-rolled with awesome window manager and no DE.
While I generally prefer to use the command-line, Thunar has been by GUI file
manager of choice ever since I started using this setup a little over 2 years
ago. It’s fast, light-weight, and gets the job done without getting in your way,
which is exactly what I need.

Planned features

Thunar does however lack a few features that would be really handy to have,
which is exactly what I’ll be working on.

Undo-redo

Adding undo and redo is an absolute no-brainer for me, and would probably be the
single biggest thing I think Thunar is currently missing. If you’re anything
like me, you’ve often selected the wrong file to move into another directory,
and you have to manually undo it and move the correct file once you realize your
mistake. Implementing this would do away with such frustrating tedium in the
case of minor mistakes.

File counts for folders

Currently, the list view in Thunar has a ‘size’ column which shows the size of
the corresponding file in the listing. However, this column is blank for folders
(or directories). As such, it’s essentially wasted space for directories, but it
could be put to good use showing the count of the files in the folder instead.

Picture-specific maximized thumbnail view

Managing pictures is primarily based on the content of the picture itself,
rather than metadata like the name, date etc. So it would be very convenient to
have a specific view optimized for folders with a large number of pictures,
where the thumbnails take up as much space on the screen as possible. Think
Pinterest, Google images etc.

If somehow I complete the work enlisted in my proposal ahead of time, I plan on
looking at some of the file system synchronisation bugs that some Thunar users
have reported.

Conclusion

I’m glad to have the opportunity to be able to work on open-source tools I
myself use everyday, and feel really lucky to have the support of Google to be
able to work on this over this summer. I’m really grateful for the help I’ve
gotten along the way to getting my proposal accepted from Sergios
Kefalidis
, Alexander Schwinn, and other members of the XFCE community.

I’d like to congratulate my fellow XFCE GSoC contributors Yogesh
Kaushik

and Amrit
Borah

as well (who coincidentally are also from different IIITs :grin:).

GSoC’22: The Journey Begins

  • May 26, 2022
  • Yogesh Kaushik

I am pleased to inform you that my proposal for GSoC with Xfce, under the mentorship of André Miranda, has been accepted. So this summer, I will be contributing to Xfce. Allow me to introduce myself and the work that I will be doing.

I am Yogesh Kaushik, a sophomore at IIIT Delhi in the Computer Science Engineering branch. As per the suggestions of a few intelligent souls in my college, I dual-booted my system and began using Linux for regular use in my first semester of college. My first Linux distribution was Kali, and that’s how I was introduced to Xfce. Over time, I also tried quite a few other desktop environments like KDE and GNOME. But for me, the simplicity of Xfce is simply unmatched. So when I got the opportunity to contribute to it, I can’t refuse it. Luckily the opportunity didn’t turn me down. Enough of my introduction; let me now tell you about my objectives for GSoC this year.

Thunar Bulk Renamer

Thunar is the file manager for Xfce. It comes with fascinating support for renaming multiple files, and that feature is called Bulk Renamer. The Bulk Renamer itself is a very advanced feature, but it may require unnecessary human intervention under some circumstances. If the user wants to rename a file, such that the new name is the original name of some other file, which is yet to be renamed, the system will require user interference. For more clarity, let’s say the user wants to rename a file as “File02”, but there is already a file named “File02,” which is already added to the Bulk Renamer but is yet to be renamed. In such a situation, the Bulk Renamer will raise an error and ask the user to fix it manually. My task would be to make the Bulk Renamer intelligent enough to identify such situations and allow it to act independently in such cases.

This would be my first task in GSoC, so how I am going to do that, you will see quite soon.

Screenshooter

As the name suggests, it is an application to take screenshots in Xfce. The application is exceptionally rich in terms of the functionalities it currently has. And my task would be to make it even more prosperous. I would introduce the support for custom actions in the Screenshooter. For those of you who would have used Xfce a lot, you must have seen the custom actions in Thunar or AppFinder. For those who don’t know it, allow me to elaborate. With the help of custom actions, the user will be able to run custom scripts for the taken screenshot. So if you want to directly upload your screenshot to your favorite hosting platform, you just need to create one script, and that’s it; you are good to go. Similarly, you can do a lot more with it.

Panel

Xfce Panel is where you can find your open apps and a lot of widgets. Depending upon your Linux Distro, you can find it on any four sides. Generally, for Kali, it is present on the top. But you can customize it according to your own choices. Now panel has a lot of plugin, some of which are internal and some are external. My task would be to merge two such plugins, namely “DateTime” and “Clock”. The two plugins are very similar and thus they should be merged for better developments in future.

If the time permits I will do a few more enhancements in the Xfce environment. My journey with Xfce has started and I hope it will go smoothly even beyond the scope of GSoC.

Congratulations to fellow Xfce GSoC contributors Pratyaksh Gautam and Amrit Borah.

A Journey Begins (GSoC – 2022)

  • May 25, 2022
  • Amrit Borah

 

Introduction

Hello 👋😁 ! I am overjoyed to announce that my proposal to XFCE for GSoC - 2022 got selected !

Oh ! I forgot to introduce myself. My name is Amrit Borah and I am a somophore undergraduate student at the Indian Institute of Information Technology Guwahati (IIITG), India, pursuing Computer Science Engineering (CSE). I have only recently completed my 4th semester at college. 

Tasks in my proposal

So, getting back to the topic at hand - GSoC, I will be taking on 4 tasks for XFCE.

Namely,

  • Implementing option to enable expansion of folders in "Details View" in Thunar. (link)The desired outcome -


  • Adding user profiles to XFCE Terminal (link)
  • I'll also be rewriting the preference-dialog in plain C. Currently it has been written using glade.
  • Handling session restoration for XFCE Terminal (link)
  • Implementing colored highlights for files/folders in Thunar. (link) The desired outcome -


  • Further details on the topics can be found on the links corresponding to the respective tasks.

    What I'll be working with -

     I will be working with GTK - 3.0 toolkit and C source code for the aforementioned tasks.

    Linux, C & XFCE

    I first started using Linux back in 2018. Quite frankly, I hated the look of Windows 10. I wasn't really tech savvy enough to really know the fundamental differences between Windows & GNU/Linux. All I could differentiate them by, was their looks. I wanted to make my desktop look and feel like MacOS. I have always liked it's pleasant looks. The MacOS desktop is pure eye candy to me. But unfortunately I never had the pleasure to own a Apple Mac. So I installed Ubuntu. Followed youtube tutorials and customised gnome to look like mac os. Then as year went by I tried out other distros like Pop OS, Opensuse, etc. But the laptop I had then was the Y530 from Lenovo which had Nvidia GTX 1050. Gaming was an issue for me. So I switched back to Windows. 

    Finally in 2020, when I got my own personal laptop for college, I got a thinkpad E14 with the intention of daily driving Linux. I tried out a variety of flavors on that hardware. It had great keyboard ! On the quest for the perfect Distro, I stumbled upon numerous YouTube channels on Linux notably DistroTube. Following the guide for Arch installation I successfully installed arch and tasted my first WM i.e Awesome WM. Customising it wasn't too bad but since I had little knowledge of lua I found it's config too verbose and hard to hack into ( (whispering...) I wasn't tech savvy back then ) . It was only a matter of time before I started WM hopping much like my distro hoping earlier. Tried out bspwm & xmonad. I even tried learning Haskell, but only went as far as the basics (didn't venture into monads).

    But I think I finally settled down on Fedora. Gnome is/was my favourite DE but I always had one gripe i.e stuttering/lagging when switching into the overview view using intel igpus. It has now been solved ig with Gnome 42, at least it's really smooth for me now. So (I sincerely hope ! distro/wm hopping is fun but tedious 😭) Gnome it is then.

     Coming onto C now, my first introduction to C programming language was in my CS course. It was one of the topics in my 1st semester. I kinda like C to be honest. I am most familiar with it's syntax more so than other programming languages. But memory management is not fun 😭. Oh the seg faults 😇 ! Later we did have Java as a course. I have a good relation with Java. But the real meaty portions of the OS was taught in my Operating Systems course in 4th sem. I loved that course.Finally got a formal introduction to the depths of an operating system.

     I hadn't used XFCE on any of my main machines since they were quite capable hardware. It's only when I bought a raspberry pi 4, I got the taste of the XFCE DE. I am quite impressed with the performant and snappy look and feel of the DE. And Now I have the pleasure to work for XFCE 😄 !

    Final thoughts

    I have gone on for too long now. So keeping it short, I am really greatful for the opportunity that I am provided with and I thank Sergios - Anestis Kefalidis (my mentor & maintainer of XFCE Terminal), Alexander Schwinn (maintainer of Thunar & xfce org admin for gsoc) & Yongha Hwang (Xfce Developer) for the reviews and support.

    I would also like to congratulate my fellow GSoC contributors - Pratyaksh Gautam & Yogesh Kaushik - and wish them the best of luck !

    Really excited ! 😁

    My contributions to XFCE

    • For Thunar (link)
    • For XFCE Terminal (link)

     

    Building a Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4 NAS

    • May 13, 2022
    • Brian Tarricone

    A few months ago, my venerable NETGEAR ReadyNAS NV+ died. Not sure what
    happened; it just shut off one day and refused to turn back on again.

    For a while now, I’ve wanted to build my own NAS. I don’t like
    proprietary hardware that depends on a manufacturer for OS updates. But
    I also didn’t want to build a large, unsightly server, and burn more
    electricity on something that would be running 24/7. Granted, my NAS
    uses spinning-rust hard disk drives, which likely draw much more power
    than most low-power mainboards and CPUs, so maybe the power consumption
    concern is a bit overblown.

    The 4th generation of the Raspberry Pi hardware has a single PCIe lane.
    In the retail model, this is wired to a USB3 chip. The Compute Module
    4, however, allows board designers to do whatever they want with it.
    I’d hoped for a while that someone would build a board with at least
    four SATA ports. I was initially excited about a group called Wire
    Trustee, but they abandoned their hardware plans to instead build a VPN.

    Then came Axzez, with their Interceptor carrier
    board
    ,
    which was exactly what I was looking for, with five SATA ports.

    Performance-wise, there are certainly better SBCs for this task. But
    I’m comfortable with the Raspberry Pi, and see it as a stable, long-term
    platform to build on.

    What follows is a simple description of my build, and how it worked out.

    Parts List

    • Axzez Interceptor carrier board
    • Axzez Interceptor board adapter (adapts the board for a mini-ITX form
      factor)
    • CM4 module (I ended up with a 4GB RAM/16GB eMMC/WiFi module, as that
      was all I could find available without having to wait the better part
      of a year for it to ship; ideally I wanted an 8GB RAM model, and
      didn’t care if it had WiFi or not)
    • Fractal Design Node 304 chassis
    • Seasonic SSP-300SFG power supply (SFX form factor)
    • Mains cable for the power supply (Seasonic doesn’t bundle one)
    • 4-pin Molex to dual 15-pin SATA power cable (if you have more than
      three hard drives)
    • SATA data cables (one for each drive)
    • CR2032 battery (the Interceptor board has a battery-backed clock)
    • Hard drives (I already had these from my previous NAS)

    Verification and OS Setup

    To start, I wanted to ensure the parts actually worked. I downloaded
    the latest 64-bit Raspberry Pi OS (minimal) image, and wrote it to a USB
    flash drive. Axzez provides their own OS image, which includes a
    patched kernel with support for the included 4-port ethernet switch. I
    don’t need this, so I preferred to stick with a more stock OS.

    I mounted the boot partition, and configured things for headless
    operation
    ,
    including connecting to a WiFi network (I wasn’t near an ethernet cable
    while doing this), enabling SSH, and creating a default user. I also
    added enable_uart=1 to /boot/config.txt so I can hook up the serial
    console; this could be useful if the board doesn’t boot for some reason.

    I pulled the cover off the chassis, unpacked the power supply, and
    seated the CM4 module into the carrier board. I plugged the ATX power
    connector into the board, attached the power LED and power switch wires
    from the chassis to the board, and plugged the USB flash drive into one
    of the board’s USB ports. I plugged in the power supply and flipped the
    switch.

    Everything turned on by itself, with the power LED glowing blue. I
    waited a few minutes, and tried to ssh to raspberrypi.local, surprised
    when I was greeted with a password prompt. Signing in presented me with
    a pretty standard-looking Raspberry Pi OS system.

    Booting from USB is fine, but I wanted the OS on the internal eMMC
    storage. So I copied the OS image over from my laptop, and then used
    dd to write it to /dev/mmcblk0. I repeated the same steps as before
    to enable headless operation. In addition, since I’m not using Axzez’s
    OS image, there are a few settings I needed to add to
    /boot/config.txt:

    1enable_uart=1
    2dtparam=i2c_vc=on
    3dtoverlay=i2c-rtc,rv3028,i2c0,addr=0x52
    

    The first isn’t required, but could be useful. The second enables the
    VideoCore’s I2C bus (not sure if this is required, but the Axzez OS does
    this). The third loads an overlay that sets up the RTC (real-time
    clock) chip included on the board.

    After that, I power-cycled after pulling the USB flash drive. Again I
    waited, and ssh’ed into the board. A quick grep through dmesg
    confirmed that the RTC setup worked:

    1rtc-rv3028 0-0052: registered as rtc0
    2rtc-rv3028 0-0052: hctosys: unable to read the hardware clock
    

    (The error is because the clock has never been written to; after the
    next clean reboot the clock should have been initialized with the time
    at shutdown.)

    While I was here, with everything disassembled and easily accessible, I
    figured it’d be a good idea to update the OS and install most of the
    software I’ll need later. So:

    1sudo apt update
    2sudo apt dist-upgrade
    3sudo apt install neovim mdadm lvm2 smartmontools ifplugd nfs-kernel-server
    4sudo apt purge vim-tiny
    

    In my case that didn’t upgrade too much, as the OS image I had
    downloaded was fairly recent. But I rebooted at this point, just to
    ensure things still come up properly after installing new packages.

    I use neovim as my primary text editor, so it made sense to install it
    here. mdadm and lvm2 are needed for managing my hard disk arrays.
    smartmontools monitors disk drive self-reported health stats.
    ifplugd is a system daemon that automatically configures wired network
    interfaces when ethernet cables are plugged in (or unplugged).
    nfs-kernel-server provides an NFS server, which is how I primarily
    access files on my NAS across the network. You might also want to
    install samba (another file sharing protocol used by Windows
    computers).

    I also modified /etc/hostname to set the hostname I wanted (and
    changed the raspberrypi entry in /etc/hosts), and added an IP
    reservation in my router for the ethernet port’s MAC address to ensure
    it always gets the same IP address (more or less required for NFS mounts
    if I don’t want it to be a pain).

    This is also a good time to run dpkg-reconfigure tzdata to set the
    desired time zone, and dpkg-reconfigure locales to set the correct
    locale.

    At this point I noticed that occasionally the board wouldn’t reboot
    cleanly (via sudo reboot). Sometimes (I discovered this by watching
    output on the serial console), the kernel would panic on reboot,
    requring me to power-cycle the power supply to continue. Annoying, but
    not a showstopper.

    Hardware Assembly

    Now that I’d verified everything works, it was time to put the
    hardware together. The manual supplied with the chassis recommended
    removing the disk brackets before starting, and then installing the
    mainboard first, followed by the power supply, and then finally the
    disks.

    Mainboard

    The mainboard was relatively straighforward to install. First screw the
    Interceptor board onto the board adapter, with the ports flush against
    the side of the adapter. Then attach the board adapter to the chassis
    itself, after screwing the four metal standoffs into the chassis.
    Orient the board adapter so the ports face out the back of the chassis.
    Don’t attach the board adapter to the chassis first, or it will be
    really difficult to screw the board into the adapter later.

    If you disconnected them, now’s a good time to reconnect the wires for
    the power switch and power LED.

    Also insert the coin-sized battery into the mainboard.

    Power Supply

    Next comes the power supply. The power supply I chose came with an
    adapter bracket to adapt the SFX form factor to a case accepting an ATX
    power supply. I chose SFX because they are often smaller and quieter.
    After attaching the bracket, mount the power supply in the chassis, with
    the power supply’s fan facing downward toward the opening in the bottom
    of the chassis.

    The chassis has a power cable extension that you can now plug into the
    power supply.

    From here you can connect the 24-pin ATX power connector to the
    mainboard.

    Now that they won’t get in the way, you can connect the three chassis
    fans to the fan connectors on the mainboard.

    Attach the 4-pin Molex to dual SATA power adapter to the appropriate
    power supply lead. This power supply only gives us three SATA power
    connectors; if you have four or five drives, you’ll need the extra
    adapter.

    Drives

    Finally it’s time to connect the hard drives. The chassis will hold up
    to six drives, though the mainboard only has ports for five of them. I
    only had four drives at the time of my build, so I plugged four SATA
    data cables into the first four SATA ports on the mainboard.

    The drives themselves were fairly straighforward to attach to the drive
    rails. I had to move one of the rubber grommets to one of the extra
    holes. I was only able to line up three screw holes on the drives I
    have, but that’s fine.

    After placing the drive rails back into the chassis, I routed power and
    data cables to each, and tried to bundle the excess cable as well as I
    could.

    Wrapping it Up

    Before closing up the chassis, I plugged in power and ethernet, and
    flipped the power switch on the side of the power supply. To my relief,
    everything came up properly, as expected, including all three fans.

    I used mdadm and vgchange to manually set up and mount my drive
    array to ensure everything was working properly (later I’d write a
    script to do it on boot).

    I deleted /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf to disable WiFi,
    since ethernet was working fine.

    Finally, I closed up the chassis and replaced the thumb screws.

    Benchmarking

    I feel like I’d be somewhat remiss if I didn’t post some performance
    numbers. Take this with many many many grains of salt. There are some
    oddities in my setup: my RAID5 array is actually two RAID5 arrays,
    joined into one logical partition using LVM2. I did a lazy dd test
    for this, to an ext4 filesystem on the RAID5+LVM2 volume, like so:

    1dd if=/dev/zero of=bench bs=4M count=10000 status=progress oflag=direct
    

    This gave me sustained write speeds of 137 MB/s.

    When reading it back, via:

    1dd if=bench of=/dev/null bs=4M status=progress iflag=direct
    

    … I get sustained read speeds of 394 MB/s.

    I know this isn’t particularly scientific, and I’m sure there are flaws
    in this benchmarking process. I don’t particularly care; I’m merely
    just trying to get a vague idea as to whether or not things are working
    reasonably well. These speeds are more than sufficient for my purposes.
    I did not test any read/write scenarios more complicated than this, and
    I didn’t do any performance tuning whatsoever.

    Final Thoughts

    Overall I’m really happy with how this build turned out. Right now I am
    just manually managing the storage and network shares on the box, though
    I have considered installing something like Open Media Vault.

    There are a few minor annoyances and omissions that would be nice for
    Axzez to implement in a future board revision:

    1. The fans don’t appear to be controllable or monitorable by the OS.
      The board supports three-wire fans, which should at least allow us to
      monitor fan speed (helpful both for control feedback as well as
      alerting if a fan has died). Controlling the speed could be done
      using the CM4’s builtin PWM hardware (maybe? though I believe there
      are only two channels), or by adding an external fan controller chip.
    2. There isn’t a way to flash the CM4 bootloader or modify the CM4’s
      boot settings. With a CM4 I/O devkit, you can place a jumper on the
      board to put it into usbboot mode, which allows you to do all this
      from a USB-connected computer, but the Interceptor board doesn’t
      provide this ability.
    3. I didn’t need to make use of the 4-port ethernet switch, but it would
      be great if Axzez could work to get the drivers for it upstreamed so
      it doesn’t require a custom kernel. At the very least, a DKMS
      package would be sufficient. To their credit, they set things up so
      single-port operation works just fine if you don’t use a patched
      kernel, which is fine for my purposes.
    4. It would be a nice addition to expose another pair of pins so I could
      connect the chassis’ HDD activity LED as well.
    5. Documenting how to enable the RTC chip on a vanilla Raspberry Pi OS
      would be nice (it wasn’t hard to figure out; I just read through
      their kernel patch).

    While the Interceptor certainly isn’t meant to be a general-purpose
    board, exposing some of the unused GPIO pins could also be really useful
    (for example, I could probably build my own fan controller daughter
    board, or set up the HDD activity LED trigger myself). I’ve heard that
    the two 40-pin FFC connectors expose an I2C and two GPIOs each, but it’s
    not the most convenient thing to work with. (Having said that, I’ll
    take what I can get!)

    One thing that I am incredibly happy with is that the board works with
    the stock Raspberry Pi OS. The last thing I want is to be stuck on an
    old version of the OS after the manufacturer loses interest in
    supporting it, which is pretty much inevitable for most products, and is
    the situation I ended up in with my old retail NAS. With the exception
    of the ethernet switch, everything on this board has upstream support,
    and the switch gracefully degrades to a single usable ethernet port when
    booted with the stock Raspberry Pi OS kernel.

    As for the rest of the hardware:

    1. The chassis I chose doesn’t make it possible to access the drives
      without opening it up. I could have chosen a chassis that has
      hot-swap bays, but I personally don’t need this, so I didn’t bother.
      I’m actually not sure if the SATA controller on the board supports
      hot-swap.
    2. This chassis has USB3 ports on the front. Because the CM4’s single
      PCIe lane is taken up by the SATA ports and ethernet switch, it does
      not have USB3 capability. Presumably I could cut the USB3 connector
      off the chassis’ cable and use the ports as USB2 ports (the main
      board has a pin header for extra USB2 ports), but this isn’t a
      priority for me to set up.
    3. There’s currently no back panel on the chassis around all the ports.
      It’s not that big a deal, though I’m afraid of dust getting drawn in
      through there.
    4. I haven’t measured the power consumption of the power supply I chose.
      I think it should be reasonably efficient at the sub-100W power draw
      expected while idle, but it’s likely not as efficient as a smaller
      supply would be. I debated going the “pico PSU” route, but decided
      to stick with something more traditional for now.

    I’m very pleased that Axzez decided to design and build this carrier
    board. I’ve been waiting for something like this ever since the CM4 was
    released, and the board did not disappoint.